The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been engaged in discussions with airframe and engine manufacturers concerning regulations that would apply to new technology fuel efficient "openrotor" engines. Existing regulations for the engines and airframe did not envision features of these engines that include eliminating the fan blade containment systems and including two rows of counter-rotating blades. Damage to the airframe from a failed blade could potentially be catastrophic. Therefore the feasibility of using aircraft fuselage shielding was investigated. In order to establish the feasibility of this shielding, a study was conducted to provide an estimate for the fuselage shielding weight required to provide protection from an open-rotor blade loss. This estimate was generated using a two-step procedure. First, a trajectory analysis was performed to determine the blade orientation and velocity at the point of impact with the fuselage. The trajectory analysis also showed that a blade dispersion angle of 3deg bounded the probable dispersion pattern and so was used for the weight estimate. Next, a finite element impact analysis was performed to determine the required shielding thickness to prevent fuselage penetration. The impact analysis was conducted using an FAA-provided composite blade geometry. The fuselage geometry was based on a medium-sized passenger composite airframe. In the analysis, both the blade and fuselage were assumed to be constructed from a T700S/PR520 triaxially-braided composite architecture. Sufficient test data on T700S/PR520 is available to enable reliable analysis, and also demonstrate its good impact resistance properties. This system was also used in modeling the surrogate blade. The estimated additional weight required for fuselage shielding for a wing- mounted counterrotating open-rotor blade is 236 lb per aircraft. This estimate is based on the shielding material serving the dual use of shielding and fuselage structure. If the shielding material is not used for dual purpose, and is only used for shielding, then the additional weight per aircraft is estimated to be 428 lb. This weight estimate is based upon a number of assumptions that would need to be revised when applying this concept to an actual airplane design. For example, the weight savings that will result when there is no fan blade containment system, manufacturing limitations which may increase the weight where variable thicknesses was assumed, engine placement on the wing versus aft fuselage, etc. Carney, Kelly and Pereira, Michael and Kohlman, Lee and Goldberg, Robert and Envia, Edmane and Lawrence, Charles and Roberts, Gary and Emmerling, William Glenn Research Center NASA/TM-2013-216582, E-18780, DOT/FAA/TC-13/34, GRC-E-DAA-TN10456 WBS 432938.01 FUSELAGES; SHIELDING; AIRCRAFT DESIGN; FAN BLADES; TURBOFAN ENGINES; AIRFRAMES; WEIGHT MEASUREMENT; STRUCTURAL WEIGHT; COMPOSITE STRUCTURES; DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; WEIGHT (MASS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; BRAIDED COMPOSITES; PITCH (INCLINATION); AIRCRAFT SAFETY